Borkman v. Commissioner of Social Welfare
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The appellant, then Rosemary Borkman, had been receiving certain benefits from the Vermont Board of Social Welfare, in the nature of assistance in the maintenance and support of herself and child. On January 1,1969, the petitioner married one Robert McAlister, then eighteen years of age. On February 1, 1969, the benefits which had been paid to Rosemary and her child were terminated by order of John J. Wackerman, then Commissioner of Social Welfare of the State of Vermont. The Commissioner of Social Welfare, by virtue of 33 V.S.A. Sec. 2504(c) (1) and (2) is granted authority to fix standards…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ormsby v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Town of Manchester v. Town of RupertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
- Town of St. Johnsbury v. Town of SuttonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Appeal of FowlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Claim of Uhrovick v. LavineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Lavigne v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Ruth M. Archibald v. Frank WhalandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.