Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Fowler
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 3, 1972No. 162-70PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Daley, Supr. J.
This appeal arises from the refusal of ANFC benefits under 33 V.S.A. by the Board of Social Welfare.
The appellant is the wife of Orville Fowler, and the mother of six minor children by a previous marriage, which terminated in divorce, and one other child born to her union with Orville Fowler. In the month of May, 1970, the appellant sought ANFC benefits for the six minors by her previous marriage. None were sought for her child by Orville Fowler. Her application was denied by the St. Albans district office, Vermont Department of Social Welfare, on June 15, 1970, because her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rutkowski v. WaskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- McManus v. HinneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Borkman v. Commissioner of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Ormsby v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Paquette v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Commonwealth v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Alber v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental DisabilitiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Mid-American Lines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.