Calley v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.
Defendant’s counsel contend that it was the legislative intent to make applicable to overhead railroad bridges the provisions of sections 2 and 3 of chapter 105 of the Revised Laws relating to highway railings erected by towns, and that the railing on the bridge at Andover must be deemed legally sufficient, since it was approved by the State Highway Department at the time of its construction.
There is nothing in the statute itself, however, which indicates an intention to include railroads within its terms and, even if there were, there is no claim that the defendant so far complied with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- McGettigan v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. FredetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Dane v. MacGregorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.