Legal Opinion
&198tna Ins. Co. v. Koonce
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 15, 1936No. 8 Div. 743PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Appellee, E. L. Koonce, brought suit substantially in Code form (section 9531, No. 13) on a policy of insurance covering loss of an automobile by theft.
The policy named plaintiff as the assured, and stipulated: “Loss, if any, payable, as interest may appear, to Assured and Bankers Finance Corporation.”
It appears the policy was given in 'connection with a loan by said finance corporation, payable in installments, secured by mortgage on the car, backed by this insurance. At the time of the loss of the car by theft, and at the time of suit brought, some installments on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sherman Gas & Electric Co. v. BeldenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Jacobi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Fire Insurance Companies v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Parker v. Fies & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Allstate Insurance v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Norman J. James and Vera M. James, Defendants-Counterclaim Felipe M. Reyes, Sr., and Shirley P. Reyes, Defendants-Counterclaim v. First Small Business Investment Company of Alabama, Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.