Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Penfield

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1932PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

This action is by plaintiff, an actress, for damages, compensatory and punitive or exemplary, for interference by the defendants with her contractual status resulting in her discharge. In 1923 the plaintiff was the winner of a national beauty contest for young women and awarded the title Miss America. Previously she had won a preliminary contest in this State and was awarded the title Miss New York. Miss America, a full figure statue in the nude, was sculptured by Howard Chandler Christie. Plaintiff “ in bathing costume ” was the model. Professionally her beauty has been exploited by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Devoe v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Metcalf v. . Van BenthuysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1850

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Felsen v. Sol Cafe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. White Plains Coat & Apron Co., Inc. v. Cintas Corp. And Cintas Corp. 2, Docket No. 05-1520-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API