Legal Opinion

Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1999No. CV-98-0118-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether a party aggrieved by final agency action must seek rehearing before that agency as a prerequisite to judicial review. We hold that, unless a statute specifically directs otherwise, one need not seek rehearing before an agency in order to seek judicial review.

I

¶ 2 In September 1995, Southwestern Paint and Varnish Company (Southwestern) sought reimbursement for environmental clean-up costs from the state. In March 1996, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (Department) denied the claim. Southwestern appealed under a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington PlCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Rowland v. Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API