Legal Opinion

Sanger Bros. v. Heirs of Moody

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1883No. Case No. 4890PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. John H. Rice, special judge. The opinion states the case sufficiently to understand the principles ' announced and the facts to which they apply.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

That the land in controversy was community property owned by Louis Moody and his wife at the time of the death of the latter in 1863 is not questioned; nor can it be denied that at the time of the sale of the land, made by Louis Moody to N. A. Birge, through whom the appellants claim by regular chain of transfer, there existed at least one community debt amounting to between four and five thousand dollars. The record renders it highly probable that a much larger community indebtedness existed.

It is further admitted that all of the appellants were purchasers of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veramendi v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Dawson v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Johnson v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Andrews' Heirs v. Brown's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Wenar v. StenzelTexas Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Stone v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Moody v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Ashe v. YungstTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Faulk v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1884

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API