Legal Opinion

Martin v. Dial

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1933No. 1381-5976PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

This case involves the title to a large tract of valuable oil land situated in Hutchison county, Tex. The record is very voluminous. Three opinions were written by the Court of Civil Appeals, covering more than 50 typewritten pages. The application for writ of error contains over 200 pages.

We have given all of the questions presented by this record a most careful consideration. The conclusion we have reached on two of the principal legal questions raised disposes of this controversy. It will therefore only be necessary to quote such portions of the record as are pertinent to our…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ehlinger v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hager v. StakesTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Dulin v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1902

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Hunt v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Stanley v. Henderson, Ind. Extr.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Colquitt v. Eureka Producing Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Bahr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Davis v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API