Legal Opinion

Moser v. Long

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an amicable suit, instituted for the purpose of determining which one of the parties is entitled to the office of prosecuting attorney of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit of the State. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of the facts, as provided for by the statute. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 190, sec. 386.

The court, upon the facts agreed upon, found that the appellee, Long, was entitled to the office, and rendered judgment accordingly.

Moser excepted, and appeals.

As preliminary to a statement of the facts agreed upon, it is proper to observe, that, in 1872, the county of Daviess…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pitman v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Board of Commissioners of Boone Co. v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Shannon v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gibson v. FriedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Marion County Election Board v. O'BRIENIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Howard v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Telford v. Bingham County Farmers' Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Marion County Election Board v. O'BRIENIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API