Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pickle v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 2015No. CR-15-3Published

1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Associate Justice

| because I believe the majority has erroneously reversed the circuit court’s denial of Appellant Jimmy Paul Pickle’s motion to suppress, I must dissent.

At the outset, I must note that the majority goes well beyond the scope of the actual issue on appeal in order to reverse the circuit court. The sole point raised by Pickle on appeal is whether “game wardens are subject to the same legal standards as all other law enforcement officers are bound to follow before detaining a citizen while engaged in a hunting activity.” Pickle argues that game wardens may not arbitrarily stop hunters in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Elzey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API