Savage v. Isthmian S. S. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This case arises on plaintiff’s motion to compel the taking of testimony by interrogatories and cross-interrogatories in lieu of oral deposition.
Plaintiff, a seaman, commenced the present action for personal injuries against the. Isthmian Steamship Company, the Matson. Navigation Company, and the Isthmian' Matson Line. The Isthmian Steamship Company has filed its answer, but the other two named defendants have not. Defend-, ant Matson Navigation Company then, moved to vacate the service of summons and complaint upon itself and the other two defendants, asserting lack of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Urquhart v. American-La France Foamite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Fox v. HouseDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1939
- Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Alemite Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1939
- In re Wisconsin Alumni Research FoundationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Watters v. Ralston Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silk v. SielingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Standifer v. McClure, Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lee County1981