Legal Opinion
Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Alemite Co.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided June 22, 1939No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYF, District Judge.
The only question of any moment is the authority of this Court to permit the plaintiff to take depositions limited to the question of jurisdiction under Rule 26(a) of the new Federal rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Defendants allege that jurisdiction has not been obtained over them, and having filed their motion to dismiss and to quash service, it is urged that no depositions can be taken by the plaintiff to produce facts to meet the affidavits filed in support of the motion to dismiss. Defendants call attention to the language of the rule which provides…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Urquhart v. American-La France Foamite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Oscar F. Collins v. New York Central System, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Savage v. Isthmian S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. OchsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.