Legal Opinion

Watters v. Ralston Coal Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1938No. 4233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant to quash the summons and to dismiss the proceedings for lack of jurisdiction. The statement alleges diversity of citizenship as ground for the jurisdiction of the court, setting out that the plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Ohio, and that the defendant is a citizen of the State of Pennsylvania. The motion to dismiss, verified by affidavit, denies that the plaintiff is a citizen of Ohio, and alleges that he is in fact a citizen of Pennsylvania.

Defendant contends, first, that plaintiff’s citizenship was not properly alleged in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Brown v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Guarantee Trust Co. v. CollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. American-La France Foamite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  3. Savage v. Isthmian S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API