Legal Opinion

National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 23, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-03522-WHOPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CORPORATE ENTITIES

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

Defendants Center for Medical Progress (“CMP”) and Biomax Procurement Services (“Biomax”) (collectively, “defendants”) seek to assert Fifth Amendment rights in response to plaintiff National Abortion Federation’s (“NAF”) discovery requests. At issue is whether corporate entities may assert Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination on the basis that their opponent has alleged that they are sham “alter ego” corporations that have no existence separate from an individual or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jane Roes v. Sfbsc Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. State v. Brelvis Consulting LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. A.F. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  4. Brelvis Consulting, Llc v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API