National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CORPORATE ENTITIES
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
Defendants Center for Medical Progress (“CMP”) and Biomax Procurement Services (“Biomax”) (collectively, “defendants”) seek to assert Fifth Amendment rights in response to plaintiff National Abortion Federation’s (“NAF”) discovery requests. At issue is whether corporate entities may assert Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination on the basis that their opponent has alleged that they are sham “alter ego” corporations that have no existence separate from an individual or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jane Roes v. Sfbsc Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- State v. Brelvis Consulting LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- A.F. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Brelvis Consulting, Llc v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.