Legal Opinion
Jane Roes v. Sfbsc Management, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 2016No. 15-15437UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
SFBSC Management, LLC (“BSC”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(B). Because BSC was not a party to the performer contracts and failed to establish that it has standing to enforce the arbitration clause, we affirm. 1 See Britton v. Co-op Banking Grp., 916 F.2d 1405, 1413 n.9 (9th Cir. 1990) (standing is “always a threshold issue” when evaluating a motion to compel arbitration).
1. Given BSC’s denials and the contradictory evidence submitted in connection with its motion to compel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Michael Ashbey v. Archstone Property ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- John Murphy v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Faine Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sarah Murphy v. Sfbsc Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Hager v. Smithfield E. Health Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019