Legal Opinion

Hauer v. Christon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1969No. 254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

We overlook the threshold question of whether an assigned judge sitting outside of his territorial jurisdiction can disregard the rules of the court in which he is sitting. This case was not assigned or removed to the court presided over by Judge Traeger. If it were, it would follow the local rules of the venue. Here, Judge Traeger was assigned to the Milwaukee county court to hear the case. We think a judge on such an assignment is bound by the local rules and should, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. Uniformity in the administration of justice can only be obtained when only one set of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Kentucky Finance Corp. v. Paramount Auto Exchange Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. UNIVERSITY NURSING ASSOCIATES v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Trispel v. HaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Grognet v. Fox Valley Trucking ServiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Furrenes v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API