Furrenes v. Ford Motor Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The issue here is as to the appropriateness of the sanction of dismissal on the merits for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the trial court discovery order for production of a tie rod and expert reports concerning such tie rod.
That the plaintiff failed to comply with the trial court discovery order cannot seriously be disputed on this record. The trial court so held, and that finding is affirmed.
It is true that, by affidavit dated two weeks after the deadline for production had passed and eighteen months after defendants had first informally requested production of the tie rod for testing,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Trispel v. HaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.