Legal Opinion
Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 7, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-1270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, District Judge.
The plaintiff is seeking to maintain this suit, in which violations of federal securities laws are alleged, as a class action. The parties have agreed, however, to put off the plaintiffs motion for class certification until after the court has reached a decision on the motion to dismiss.
The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-16 promulgated thereunder, the “purpose and effect of these violations to induce plaintiff and other class members to purchase various securities through Bache and to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,357 Marbury Management, Inc., and Harry Bader, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Alfred Kohn, and Wood, Walker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Slomiak v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Laura Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985