Legal Opinion

United States v. Read

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 9, 1981No. Nos. 80-1017 to 80-1019PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Ralph Read, Ronald E. Spiegel, and Howard Swiger appeal their convictions for conspiracy, mail fraud, and securities fraud. We affirm the judgments of conviction entered for Ralph Read and Howard Swiger in Nos. 80-1017 and 80-1019. We reverse Ronald Spiegel’s conviction for conspiracy in No. 80-1018 and remand for a new trial. We affirm Spiegel’s conviction on the substantive counts.

I

The indictment charged a scheme to artificially inflate the year-end inventory of Cenco Medical Health Supply Corporation (“CMH”) and thus increase its reported profits.…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Eric Parker, Gary Phillips, and Keith MoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API