Legal Opinion
United States v. Bowden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1950No. 4035PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
On August 23, 1949, the clerk of the court below entered a default judgment against the Bowdens in favor of the United States for $153.93, being the balance due on a promissory note. On August 27, 1949, the clerk taxed costs against the Bowdens, but did not include the attorney’s docket fee of $20 claimed by the United States. The District Court, on motion to retax the costs, refused to tax the attorney’s docket fee.
28 U.S.C.A. § 1923 in part provides:
“(a) Attorney’s and proctor’s docket fees in courts of the United States may be taxed as costs as follows:
“$20 on trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kittredge v. RaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mayor v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Fernandez v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Nevada Power Co. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Fernandez v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.