Barnett v. Keilig
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
O’DONNELL, J. pro tem.*
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by defendant's automobile while walking across a street intersection in the city of San Francisco. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $1,500. After judgment was entered on the verdict, plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground, among others, of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The trial judge denied the motion and this appeal from the judgment ensued.
*179Plaintiff’s sole contention on this appeal is that the verdict of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Reilley v. McIntireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Sanford v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Belyew v. United Parcel ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Whyatt v. KukuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.