Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Keilig

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1959No. Civ. No. 18252Published

1Opinion of the Court

O’DONNELL, J. pro tem.*

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by defendant's automobile while walking across a street intersection in the city of San Francisco. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $1,500. After judgment was entered on the verdict, plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground, among others, of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The trial judge denied the motion and this appeal from the judgment ensued.

*179Plaintiff’s sole contention on this appeal is that the verdict of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Reilley v. McIntireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Sanford v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Belyew v. United Parcel ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Whyatt v. KukuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API