Legal Opinion

Whyatt v. Kukura

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1958No. Civ. 22642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff was given judgment upon a jury verdict in the amount of $750, in an action seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. As stated in her opening brief: “Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on jury verdict and from denial of her motion for a new trial upon the following grounds: Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict in that damages awarded plaintiff for personal injuries in the automobile accident were grossly inadequate to compensate her for the special and general damages she suffered; error, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Taylor v. HawkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Clifford v. RuoccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kraut v. CornellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Barnett v. KeiligCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Brent Nussbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  4. Metros v. Chowdhary CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Sievers v. Hill CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API