Legal Opinion

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 12, 1963No. 1 Div. 140PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

The State of Alabama, appellee and complainant below, filed an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief because appellant Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, hereinafter designated L&N, had connected with a spur track on a highway right-of-way purchased by the State, and was operating trains across the right-of-way on the spur track. The appeal was taken from a decree holding that the State’s rights were superior to those of appellant and enjoining L&N from using the spur track on the right-of-way.

In 1942, appellant Southern Furniture Manufacturing Company,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lott v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Shelby County v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Moore v. CookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Wilbanks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Galleon Industries, Inc. v. Lewyn MacHinery Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. General Finance Corporation v. BradwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Lonnie Russell Ford, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API