Legal Opinion

Pierson v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1968No. Civ. 31146Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 Cal.App.2d 86 (1968)

GLORIA PIERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. No. 31146.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

May 10, 1968.

Herbert A. Holmes, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Meserve, Mumper & Hughes, Cromwell Warner, Jr., and Dennett F. Kouri for Defendants and Respondents.

ROTH, P. J.

Appellant, the beneficiary of a policy issued by respondent company (herein severally referred to as respondent) insuring the life of her husband, seeks declaratory relief against respondent and one Gormley to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sawyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API