Legal Opinion
Clayton v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Betty Clayton brought suit against the District of Columbia (“District”) and the District of Columbia National Guard (“DCNG”), alleging that the District violated D.C. law by retaliating against her for making protected disclosures and for engaging in other protected conduct, and that the defendants violated the United States Constitution by depriving her of her property interest in her employment without due process. Clayton moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 for leave to amend her complaint. Because the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Warren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Yueh-Lan Wang Ex Rel. Wen-Young Wong v. New Mighty U.S. TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Clayton v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- American Center for Law and Justice v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.