Legal Opinion
Clayton v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1316PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
In the instant action, Plaintiff Betty Clayton sues the District of Columbia (“the District”) and the District of Colum bia National Guard alleging discrimination and retaliation under Title VIL Clayton moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) to consolidate this action (“Clayton II ”) with Clayton v. District of Columbia, et al., Civil Action No. 11-1889(RWR) (D.D.C., filed Oct. 26, 2011) (“Clayton I ”). Because Clayton is claim-splitting by raising two Title VII causes of action in Clayton II that have now been added in Clayton I,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Brenda Curtis and Alvin Williamson v. Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc. And Citicorp SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Serlin v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Katz v. GerardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hudson v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Coulibaly v. PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Smith v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Sweeney v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lucas, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.