Legal Opinion

Hedglin v. Stahl Specialty Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1995No. WD 49613PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

The appellants in this wrongful death action ask this court to recognize “the dual capacity doctrine” which would permit them to maintain this action although they have already received benefits under Missouri’s workers’ compensation statutes. We decline to recognize the doctrine and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the appellants’ suit against Stahl Specialty Company. We reverse, however, the trial court’s dismissal of their suit against Dale Corkran, a supervisor at Stahl Specialty who, the appellants contend, acted outside the scope of his employment and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tauchert v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Knudson v. Systems Painters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Crissy Simpson v. Tim ThomureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Hansen v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API