Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. Otho R. Day
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1964No. 7658PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARRAJ, District Judge.
This diversity action was brought by appellee, who had obtained a judgment in an Oklahoma State Court against Jack Wininger and two others (Larry Craven and Wayne Cornett) not here involved, against Jack Wininger’s insurer, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., appellant herein. The state court judgment arose out of an automobile accident. The instant suit was tried to the Court, and the Court’s opinion may be considered to contain his findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon. The facts pertinent to the instant suit are as follows.
On August 30, 1959, three cars…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Melcher v. . Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Zurich Insurance v. MartinezNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Allstate Insurance v. JahrlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Starks v. North East Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hubner & Williams Construction Co. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1967
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1968
- Schroth v. New Mexico Self-Insurer's FundNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. PlunkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.