Legal Opinion

Schroth v. New Mexico Self-Insurer's Fund

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1992No. 20122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment which found coverage under the New Mexico Self-Insurer’s Fund’s (NMSIF) contract of insurance for uninsured motorist benefits. Following a non-jury trial, the court entered its declaratory judgment on July 15, 1991, ruling that Richard Schroth may pursue uninsured motorist benefits from NMSIF. NMSIF appeals the court’s judgment. We affirm.

I

On September 9,1987, while employed by the City of Farmington (City), Schroth was involved in a motor vehicle collision with Robert L. Homrich. Schroth reported the accident to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Alcazar v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. Melinda Lucero v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Mitchell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  4. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API