Hubner & Williams Construction Co. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, Chief Judge.
Both parties to this action have moved for summary judgments in their favor. The following is a capsule summary of what are apparently agreed facts in the case. Plaintiff is a construction company which at all pertinent times was insured with a liability policy issued by defendant insurance carrier. In December of 1962, plaintiff was working on a construction project in Weld County, Colorado, erecting an overpass. A portion of the work on that project had been subcontracted to the R. & S. Steel Erection Company.
On or about December 8, 1962,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Melcher v. . Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Barclay v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Zurich Insurance v. MartinezNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Allstate Insurance v. JahrlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equip. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Silas L. Jennings v. Horace Mann Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Dairyland Insurance Company v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1973
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SamsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.