Legal Opinion

Adams v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926No. 4365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

On February 19, 1925, the plaintiff herein, a former employee of the defendant American Fuel Company, subject to the provisions of the Utah Industrial Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165), filed with the Industrial Commission an application for compensation under said act. It is alleged in his application that on the 26th day of November, 1924, while in the course of his employment by said fuel company, he was personally injured as the result of an accident. It appears from his application that he was driving a team hauling ashes, and drove his team into an ash pit for the purpose of loading…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ogden City v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Geo. A. Lowe Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. Industrial Commisson of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers, Locals No. 222 & 976 of International Brotherhood v. Orange Transportation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Grasteit v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API