Legal Opinion

Van Auken v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 2010No. A10A0462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

After he was arrested during a traffic stop, Jason Van Auken filed a motion to suppress, arguing that the arresting officer lacked articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle for violating Georgia’s “move-over” statute, which imposes a duty upon drivers to slow down or change lanes when approaching a stationary emergency vehicle with its flashing lights activated. OCGA § 40-6-16 (a). The trial court denied the motion, concluding that while Van Auken technically had not committed a “move-over” violation, the officer had articulable suspicion to make the stop because he had a good…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Abigail Patrice James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  4. Durlav Rijal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Paul Serdula v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API