Hash v. State

Phipps, Judge.

Thomas Hash appeals his convictions for aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and disorderly conduct.* 1 He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial and directed verdict and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We affirm because we find that the trial court properly denied the motions and that the evidence was sufficient.

Construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, the jury was authorized to find that the following occurred. On the night of November 29, 1998,…