Legal Opinion

Ingraham, Corbin & May v. Edwards

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. George W. Pleasants, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

The declaration was in debt, and contained only one count. The instrument declared on was termed a writing obligatory, and when introduced in evidence, it appeared to be an ordinary penal bond, upon condition, and was signed by the principals, with a seal affixed, by their attorney, and a seal affixed to his name, as well as to the name of the surety. The bond must be regarded as the foundation of the suit, and no attempt has been made to declare upon a simple contract.

If the pleader intended to rely upon a contract not under seal, he should have so pleaded, in an appropriate form, or added…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Bragg v. FessendenIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Judd v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Walsh v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Smyth v. LynchColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Smith v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Gage v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API