Sales Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The chief and, indeed, the decisive question in this case, as shown by the record, is whether the guaranty of the bond is limited to the defalcations of the- employee, Sneed, in managerial service, at Oxford, Ala., or whether it covers such service, as actually rendered by him, in the Denegre Company’s business, at Anniston.
The trial court received evidence showing that the company never had a place of business at Oxford, but did have one at Annis-ton, where it operated one of its stores at the time of defendant’s guaranty, and continuously from, 1918 to 1921; and that Sneed, at first, lived…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Penny Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Scott v. MyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Russell v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dill v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- National Surety Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Eureka Coal Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934