Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bishop

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1994No. 167 and 168PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Grady Bishop appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on December 23, 1992, which denied him relief under the now-superseded Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). 1 Asserting that the appeal is frivolous, appellate counsel requests permission to withdraw. For the reasons set forth below, we grant counsel’s request and affirm the order denying PCHA relief.

The facts may be summarized as follows. On the evening of January 24, 1977, appellant and Gerald Rawls forcibly entered a Philadelphia apartment and after ransacking it, stole a color…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. McElrath v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. SampleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Hont v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API