Legal Opinion

Rohlck v. J & L RAINBOW, INC.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEEVER, Circuit Judge.

Claimant appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Taryl Rohlck (Claimant) was employed by the Lime Lite Casino (Casino) as an occasional security person. He began this employment in January of 1991. Claimant’s responsibilities included checking patrons’ identifications and escorting unruly patrons from the bar. He normally worked a five-horn* shift on Fridays and Saturdays. While employed at the Casino, Claimant was under the supervision of manager Chonette Banks (Banks).

On the night of August…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Helms v. Lynn's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Grauel v. South Dakota School of Mines & TechnologySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Fair v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Norton v. Deuel School District 19-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API