Legal Opinion
Archambeault v. Jamelle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The complaint in the action consists of the common counts, with a bill of particulars added claiming performance of services by the plaintiff as a clerk for defendants for the period of thirty-nine weeks from May 16th, 1921, to February 11th, 1922, at $33 per week, with a credit of fourteen payments at various times aggregating $312.72 and leaving a balance due of $974.28 with interest.
Defendants answered as follows: “Answer. The defendants deny that they are indebted to the plaintiff in the amount claimed under the bill of particulars, or in any amount whatever. Special Defense. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lent v. New York & Massachusetts Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- City of Hartford v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Mercer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Connecticut Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Prince v. TakashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Apuzzo v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Furber v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Altieri v. Peattie Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State v. SinvilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.