Legal Opinion
State v. Bradshaw
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 2004No. 74410-6PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
Petitioners Donald Bradshaw and Christian Latovlovici (hereinafter defendants) seek review of an unpublished per curiam Court of Appeals decision affirming their convictions of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. They ask us to overrule State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373, 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982), and imply a mens rea element into the unlawful possession of a controlled substance statute (hereinafter the mere possession statute).1 We refuse to do so and affirm the Court of Appeals.
I. FACTS
Bradshaw, a Canadian citizen, approached the Blaine crossing to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Shelton v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.