Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Plaid Pantries, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 12, 2001No. CIV-01-338-HUPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubei filed Findings and Recommendation (# 43) on July 26, 2001, in the above-entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubei’s Findings and Recommendation (# 43) dated July…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. No. 94-3025Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Ficken v. GoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Beard v. Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Pacheco v. St. Luke's Emergency Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. McNerny v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API