Legal Opinion
Honda v. Clark
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 25, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 1179-64PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM B. JONES, District Judge.
Petitioners Thomas H. Cardan and Philip W. Amram have applied to the Court to award them fair compensation equal to the fair value of the services which they claim that they, as members of the bar of this Court, rendered to plaintiffs and similarly situated persons. They seek to have this award made out of a fund resulting from the vesting in the Alien Property Custodian in 1943 of the assets of the Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. They do not ask for any part of that fund which will be necessary to pay the plaintiffs and others similarly situated under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whittier v. EmmetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Kondo v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- George T. Aratani v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- George T. Aratani v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Honda v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Ayako Honda, Thomas H. Carolan v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States. Ayako Honda v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Honda v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968