Legal Opinion
Perry v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided April 15, 1994No. 3-91-1061, 3-91-1069PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the Report and Recommendation (entered July 12, 1993; Docket Entry No. 71) of the Magistrate Judge, as well as the objections of the plaintiff (filed July 26, 1993; Docket Entry No. 76), defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) (filed August 3, 1993; Docket Entry No. 77), and defendant United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund (United Fund) (filed August 6, 1993; Docket Entry No. 79). The Court hereby makes a de novo determination of the ease upon the record, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santana v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Hammack v. Baroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003