Legal Opinion

Hammack v. Baroid Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1998No. 97-40632PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In this case arising under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., Joe Ham-mack sued Baroid Corporation, demanding coverage under the company’s health plan for his wife’s hospital bills. The district court concluded that the Medicare as Secondary Payer (“MSP”) statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b), does not apply and awarded Hammack $124, a fraction of what he had sought. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

When Hammack retired from his job with NL Industries in 1985, at age 55, he was under an NL Industries health plan that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. The Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. Group Benefits Plan for Salaried and Non-Bargaining Hourly Employees v. Leonard Whitehurst, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Richard C. Fiore v. Washington County Community Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Freudensprung v. Offshore Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. White v. FairCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Sepulvado v. CSC Credit Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Zielinski v. Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. United States v. HerreraDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API