Commonwealth v. Mouzon

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 This case returns to us on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a plurality1 of which found that our memorandum decision relied on the erroneous rationale that a sentence cannot, as a matter of law, be manifestly excessive when it is within statutory limits. After a review of Mouzon’s claim on the merits,2 we af*1128firm the judgment of sentence entered below.

¶ 2 Charged for his involvement in three armed robberies of neighborhood establishments, Mouzon was tried before a jury and found guilty of eight counts of robbery, eight counts of possessing an instrument of…