Legal Opinion

Danielle Larson v. Xyz Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 3, 2017No. 2016-C-0745PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, J.1

_JjWe granted the writ application in this case to review the applicability "of La. R.S. 9:2795.3, the Equine Immunity Statute. The trial court granted a motion for sura-mary judgment filed by Equest Farm, LLC, finding that the immunity statute applied because plaintiff Danielle Larson was a participant engaged in equine activity at the time the Equest Farm pony bit her. The court of appeal reversed, holding that Larson was not a “participant” under the immunity statute, and that summary judgment was inappropriate because there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Richard v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Schultz v. GuothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Richardson v. CotterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Schroeder v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Chreene v. Howard C. Prince, Jr. & Rowdy Adventures, L. L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Higginbotham v. USAgencies Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Pelitire v. RinkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API