Legal Opinion

Bratt v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 28, 2020No. 39/19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry Daniel Bratt v. State of Maryland, No. 39, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW—SENTENCING—CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED— CORRECTION TO COMMITMENT RECORD—MOTION TO CORRECT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE The Court of Appeals held that the failure to award credit for time served against a sentence was not an illegality to which Rule 4-345 applies. Rather, Rule 4-345 applies to substantive illegalities that exist in the sentence itself. Failure to award credit is a procedural defect that is not appropriately addressed by a motion to correct an illegal sentence because it has no impact on…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Farmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Hallam v. New Life Evang. Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  4. In re: K.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API