Legal Opinion
Spell v. Connecticut, Office of Chief State's Attorney
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 17, 2009No. Civil 3:07CV00453 (AWT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stacy Spell (“Spell”) brings this action against the State of Connecticut, Office of Chief State’s Attorney (“Chief State’s Attorney”) setting forth claims for racial discrimination in violation of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60, et seq. (“CFEPA”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Ti-tie VII”). The defendants have moved for summary judgment on both counts. For the reasons stated below, the motion is being granted.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bader v. Special Metals Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Johnson v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011