Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Connecticut
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 20, 2011No. Civil Action 3:10CV0175 (PCD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PETER C. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carl Johnson, a current employee of the State of Connecticut, brings this action against his employer, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant discriminated against him on the basis of his race in violation of Title VII and the Connecticut Fair Employment Act, General Statutes § 46a-60, when Defendant did not promote him from a temporary to a full-time position. Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment on all counts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ellis v. Century 21 Department StoresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Kantrowitz v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Baker v. CT TransitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Bamba v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS-FPS)District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Cooper v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.