Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alpena National Bank v. Greenbaum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890Published

Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.

1DissentMorse, J.

When this case was here before,' the testimony of George L. Maltz, the principal manager of the plaintiff, and its chief witness, carried the impression and conviction to us that there was deposited in the plaintiff bank sufficient funds derived from the trust mortgages, of which Maltz was trustee, to pay in full the class of notes to which these in suit belonged. We were strengthened in this conviction by the brief of plaintiff’s counsel, which plainly carried the same impres*33sion. We tlien held that the money thus received on these mortgages by Maltz, and held by him on deposit, in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SwinefordMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Alpena National Bank v. GreenbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API