Legal Opinion

Wall v. Garrison

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Lake County. Action by David K. Wall and John A. Witter against Emma D. Garrison and A. J. Quate. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

De France, C.

David K. Wall and John A. Witter, the plaintiffs, brought this action against Emma D. Garrison and A. J. Quate, the defendants, to recover the possession of five horses, which were alleged in the complaint to be the property of the plaintiffs, and to be *516wrongfully detained from their possession by the defendants. The action was brought in July, 1882, in the district court of Pitkin county, and was removed to Lake county for trial. The defendants denied the allegations of the complaint, and alleged that they had a lien upon said horses, as stable-keepers, for the sum of $300, for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bissell v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. People ex rel. Kellogg v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Webster v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Columbia Wire Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  5. In re Fourth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API